Access the final report: National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Perinatal Care 2008.
The
Opportunity
To date, quality measurement and
reporting has focused primarily on common
medical conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, pneumonia, and surgical performance,
while the focus on maternal-child care has been limited. Morbidity and mortality
associated with pregnancy and childbirth remain substantial and, research suggests,
are to a large extent preventable through adherence to existing evidence-based guidelines.
Because pregnancy/childbirth is the second most common reason for hospital admission,
deficiencies in perinatal care affect a large population of vulnerable patients
and represent a significant opportunity for quality improvement. However,
without appropriate information about hospital performance at a national level,
perinatal quality improvement efforts will be unfocused and incentives for
improvement limited.
Statistics
In the United States, pregnancy/child birth is the second most common reason
for hospital admission.1 In 2005, 4.2 million childbirth-related
hospital stays were recorded,2 and during these stays the 5 most
common procedures performed for patients ages 18 through 44 were related to
pregnancy and childbirth.3 Birth-related procedures were the most
common procedures for infants.4 Given the sizeable volume of
maternity admissions, deficiencies in perinatal care can affect a large
population of vulnerable patients. Morbidity and mortality associated with
pregnancy and childbirth are substantial and, evidence suggests, are largely
preventable through the delivery of high-quality perinatal care and adherence
to evidence-based guidelines. Poor-quality care during the third trimester,
labor and delivery, and the postpartum period can translate into unnecessary complications,
prolonged lengths of stay, costly neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
admissions, and anxiety and suffering for patients and families. Moreover,
numerous studies have documented persistent racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic
disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality, preterm births, low
birthweight infants, and other adverse outcomes.5,6,7
About
the Project
Recognizing
the importance of quality healthcare for mothers and newborns, in October 2008 the National Quality Forum endorsed 17
perinatal standards to measure and thereby improve care received by mothers and
babies during the third trimester of pregnancy through hospital discharge.
Results
This
report presents 17 consensus standards addressing care received during the last
trimester of pregnancy through hospital discharge for both mother and newborn.
The consensus standards address care provided by both individual clinicians
(i.e., physicians and midwives) and facilities, including both hospitals and
freestanding birthing centers. These standards reflect aspects of care—both
processes and outcomes—that can be substantially influenced by provider
performance. Four of the five measures previously endorsed by NQF have been
retired and replaced by this measure set. The purpose of these consensus
standards is to improve the quality of maternal-child care—through accountability
and public reporting—by standardizing quality measurement in all relevant care
settings.
Process
This project, like all NQF activities, involved the active
participation of representatives from across the spectrum of healthcare
stakeholders. The project was guided by a Steering Committee whose members were
nominated by NQF membership and members of the public. Candidate
measures were considered for NQF endorsement as national voluntary consensus
standards. Agreement was developed through NQF’s Consensus Development Process
(CDP, version 1.8).
Funding
Funding for this project has been provided by the Hospital
Corporation of America (HCA), Inc.
Contact
Information
Reva Winkler, MD, MPH, Program Director, at (202) 783-1300 or
email your questions toperinatalcare@qualityforum.org
Notes
1 Agency for
Healthcare Quality and Research, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.
HCUP Facts and Figures: Statistics on Hospital-based Care in the United States,
2005, p. 43. Available at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/factsandfigures/ HAR_2005.pdf. Last accessed March 2009.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid., p. 42.
4 Ibid.
5 David RJ, Collins JW Jr, Differing birth weight among infants of
U.S.-born blacks, African-born blacks, and U.S.-born whites, N Engl J Med,
1997;337(17):1209-1214.
6 Saftlas AF, Koonin LM, Atrash KH, Racial disparity in
pregnancy-related mortality associated with livebirth: can established risk
factors explain it? Am J Epidemiol, 2000;152(5):413-419.
7 Luo ZC, Wilkims R, Kramer MS, The fetal and infant health study
group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, disparities
in pregnancy outcomes according to marital and cohabitation status,Obstet
Gynecol, 2004;103(6):1300-1307.
This NQF project presents 17 consensus standards addressing care
received during the last trimester of pregnancy through hospital discharge for
both mother and newborn. The consensus standards address care provided by both
individual clinicians (i.e., physicians and midwives) and facilities, including
both hospitals and freestanding birthing centers. These standards reflect
aspects of care—both processes and outcomes—that can be substantially influenced
by provider performance. Four of the five measures previously endorsed by NQF
have been retired and replaced by this measure set.
The
project Steering Committee, representing the full range of stakeholder
perspectives, was formed following the process set forth in NQF’s Consensus
Development Process. Nominations were accepted from October 1 through 31, 2007.
Steering Committee Roster
NQF
called for practices in October 2007. By November 1, 33 candidate consensus
standards were either submitted or identified.
Table of Submitted Measures
The
Steering Committee first convened via conference call in December 2007. It met
in person and via conference calls through April to evaluate submissions and
prepare the draft report. The committee identified 18 standards to present for
comment and member voting.
The Steering Committee met via conference call on February 4, 2008.
Meeting Minutes
The Steering Committee met via conference call on March 10, 2008.
Meeting Minutes
The Steering Committee met via conference call on April 4, 2008.
Meeting Minutes
The Steering Committee met via conference call on July 9, 2008.
Meeting Agenda
Member
voting on the 18 measures was held from July 21 through August 19. Also, 24
letters with comments were submitted during the voting. The comments both reiterated issues already
identified during the comment period as well as raised some completely new
issues.
View Draft Report
The
CSAC received the measures on September 16, and considered the member voting
results as well as all comments received to date. The committee recommended
that 17 measures be endorsed and that 3 measures be retired.