On March 18, NQF released for public comment a set of draft recommendations that have generated broad, vigorous discussion among quality and policy leaders. The recommendations -- from a diverse panel of 26 national experts convened by NQF at the request of the federal government -- tackle a critical question: Should measures used to assess provider performance be risk-adjusted to account for patients who are poor, homeless, illiterate, uneducated, or have other indicators of lower socioeconomic status?
“This high profile, complex issue has far reaching implications
for many —from patients and providers to state and federal health policymakers,”
said Debra Ness, president of the National Partnership for Women &
Families. “The report has catalyzed a much needed, thoughtful national
conversation about the intersection between health care performance and
socioeconomics, and about disadvantaged patients and the providers who treat
The draft report, Risk
Adjustment for Sociodemographic Status or Other Sociodemographic Factors,
recommends that risk adjustment may be appropriate for some performance
measures under some conditions, a change to current NQF policy. More than 650 comments on the report have been submitted to NQF from 160 organizations and each will be considered by the Expert Panel. A final report is expected in July 2014.
Don’t miss the NQF 2023 Annual Conference as it returns in person to Washington, DC. Register now for the early bird rate!
Updated Technical Guidance gives measure developers a roadmap to create patient-centric measures that assess the quality of care
Project will advance health content quality standards prioritizing accessibility
7 measures recommended for removal or conditional removal, 25 for retention or conditional retention
1099 14th Street NW Suite 500Washington DC 20005
202-783-1300 Main202-783-3434 Faxinfo@qualityforum.org